Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Muse Spark

Verdict

Muse Spark leads 6–1 across 7 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 1 · Muse Spark 6 · higher isn't always better — check the caveats below.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare

Sort

Claude Sonnet 4.6Muse Spark

3.14
ACritPt
11.33
56.84
AFrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
68.42
13.83
AFrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
24.33
83.16
BGPQA diamond
86.4
85.78
AOTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
88.89
45
AProofBench
17
29
ASimpleQA Verified
66.3

Capabilities

Math

Math: Muse Spark leads 3–0 across 3 shared math benchmarks (largest gap: FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private, 68.42 vs 56.84 — single evaluator).

6 reproduced

Reasoning

Reasoning: Muse Spark leads 2–0 across 2 shared reasoning benchmarks (largest gap: SimpleQA Verified, 66.3 vs 29 — single evaluator).

4 reproduced

A higher score does not always mean a better model. Each number is task performance under a disclosed harness. Of the 14 measurements across 7 shared benchmarks, 14 single-evaluator or undisclosed-protocol reports; 71% are independently reproduced. Check any benchmark's integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Frequently asked questions

Muse Spark leads 6–1 across 7 shared benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads 1 benchmark and Muse Spark leads 6. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Muse Spark have 7 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

Muse Spark leads math 3–0. Muse Spark leads reasoning 2–0.

Follow the record

These models

Same tier