Skip to content

DeepSeek-V3 vs Kimi K2.5

Verdict

Kimi K2.5 leads 4–0 across 4 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3 0 · Kimi K2.5 4 · higher isn't always better — see caveats.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare

Sort
DeepSeek-V3Kimi K2.5

Capabilities

Math

Math: Kimi K2.5 leads 2–0 across 2 shared math benchmarks (largest gap: OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025, 92.19 vs 15.75 — single evaluator).

4 reproduced

Reasoning

Reasoning: Kimi K2.5 leads 2–0 across 2 shared reasoning benchmarks (largest gap: GPQA diamond, 83.47 vs 42.05 — single evaluator).

2 reproduced2 unverified

What the labs claim

Vendor claims — compare against the measured scores above. A claim is what a developer says about its own model, not an independent measurement.

DeepSeek-V3

Coding

  • DeepSeek-V3 achieves the best performance on most benchmarks, especially on math and code tasks.

General

  • At an economical cost of only 2.664M H800 GPU hours, we complete the pre-training of DeepSeek-V3 on 14.8T tokens, producing the currently strongest open-source base model.
  • DeepSeek-V3 outperforms other open-source models and achieves performance comparable to leading closed-source models.

Reasoning

  • Our pipeline elegantly incorporates the verification and reflection patterns of R1 into DeepSeek-V3 and notably improves its reasoning performance.

Kimi K2.5

Agentic / Tool Use

  • It seamlessly integrates vision and language understanding with advanced agentic capabilities, instant and thinking modes, as well as conversational and agentic paradigms.
  • K2.5 transitions from single-agent scaling to a self-directed, coordinated swarm-like execution scheme.

Coding

  • K2.5 generates code from visual specifications (UI designs, video workflows) and autonomously orchestrates tools for visual data processing.

Multimodal

  • Kimi K2.5 is an open-source, native multimodal agentic model built through continual pretraining on approximately 15 trillion mixed visual and text tokens atop Kimi-K2-Base.
A higher number is not always a better model. Each score is task performance under a disclosed harness. Of the 8 measurements across 4 shared benchmarks, 8 single-evaluator or undisclosed-protocol reports; 75% are independently reproduced. Kimi K2.5 pricing is cross-check disputed — weigh cost claims with the same caution as benchmark wins. Follow any benchmark to its integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Follow the record