tensor.news
Integrity IndexModelsCompareLabsPapersMethodologyAbout
tensor.news

© 2026

Evidence

  • Integrity Index
  • Model Claim Ledger
  • Compare

Entities

  • Models
  • Benchmarks
  • Labs
  • Papers

Method

  • Methodology
  • About
  • Privacy

Machine

  • Feed (Atom)
  • llms.txt
  • llms-full.txt
  • Sitemap

tensor.news grades benchmarks and tags model claims by evidence status. Every fact carries a source record and provenance. Scores are framed as task performance under a disclosed harness, never as deployed capability.

← Compare

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Llama 3.1-405B

Verdict

Llama 3.1-405B leads 3–2 across 5 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) 2 · Llama 3.1-405B 3 · higher isn't always better — see caveats.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)Llama 3.1-405B
  • 85.6
    BBH
    77.2
  • 27.82
    GPQA diamond
    34.55
  • 40.75
    MATH level 5
    49.77
  • 81.2
    MMLU
    79.33
  • 6.71
    OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
    9.63
A higher number is not always a better model. Each score is task performance under a disclosed harness, and some of these benchmarks are saturated or scored under mixed harnesses. Follow any benchmark to its integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Follow the record

These models

  • Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)85.6
  • Llama 3.1-405B93.73

Llama 3.1-405B vs …

  • vs PowerMoE-3b
  • vs Claude Fable 5
  • vs GPT-5.5
  • vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
  • vs phi-3-small 7.4B