tensor.news
Integrity IndexModelsCompareLabsPapersMethodologyAbout
tensor.news

© 2026

Evidence

  • Integrity Index
  • Model Claim Ledger
  • Compare

Entities

  • Models
  • Benchmarks
  • Labs
  • Papers

Method

  • Methodology
  • About
  • Privacy

Machine

  • Feed (Atom)
  • llms.txt
  • llms-full.txt
  • Sitemap

tensor.news grades benchmarks and tags model claims by evidence status. Every fact carries a source record and provenance. Scores are framed as task performance under a disclosed harness, never as deployed capability.

← Compare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 3.1-405B

Verdict

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 4–0 across 4 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro 4 · Llama 3.1-405B 0 · higher isn't always better — see caveats.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Gemini 3.1 ProLlama 3.1-405B
  • 92.13
    GPQA diamond
    34.55
  • 95.6
    OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
    9.63
  • 75.52
    SimpleBench
    7.6
  • 72.1
    WeirdML
    21.38
A higher number is not always a better model. Each score is task performance under a disclosed harness, and some of these benchmarks are saturated or scored under mixed harnesses. Follow any benchmark to its integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Follow the record

These models

  • Gemini 3.1 Pro98
  • Llama 3.1-405B93.73

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs …

  • vs PowerMoE-3b
  • vs Claude Fable 5
  • vs GPT-5.5
  • vs phi-3-small 7.4B
  • vs DeepSeek-V3

Llama 3.1-405B vs …

  • vs PowerMoE-3b
  • vs Claude Fable 5
  • vs GPT-5.5
  • vs phi-3-small 7.4B
  • vs DeepSeek-V3