tensor.news
Integrity IndexModelsCompareLabsPapersMethodologyAbout
tensor.news

© 2026

Evidence

  • Integrity Index
  • Model Claim Ledger
  • Compare

Entities

  • Models
  • Benchmarks
  • Labs
  • Papers

Method

  • Methodology
  • About
  • Privacy

Machine

  • Feed (Atom)
  • llms.txt
  • llms-full.txt
  • Sitemap

tensor.news grades benchmarks and tags model claims by evidence status. Every fact carries a source record and provenance. Scores are framed as task performance under a disclosed harness, never as deployed capability.

← Compare

Gemini 3 Pro vs GLM-5.1

Verdict

Gemini 3 Pro leads 8–2 across 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3 Pro 8 · GLM-5.1 2 · higher isn't always better — see caveats.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Gemini 3 ProGLM-5.1
  • 31
    Chess Puzzles
    18
  • 6.9
    CritPt
    4.57
  • 65.96
    FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
    58.68
  • 31.25
    FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
    20.83
  • 90.15
    GPQA diamond
    80.64
  • 91.38
    OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
    92.21
  • 71.68
    SimpleBench
    50.44
  • 72.9
    SimpleQA Verified
    37.29
  • 72.93
    SWE-Bench verified
    74.17
  • 69.93
    WeirdML
    57.1
A higher number is not always a better model. Each score is task performance under a disclosed harness, and some of these benchmarks are saturated or scored under mixed harnesses. Follow any benchmark to its integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Follow the record

These models

  • Gemini 3 Pro91.38
  • GLM-5.192.21