GLM-5.1 vs Muse Spark

Verdict

Muse Spark leads 4–3 across 7 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 3 · Muse Spark 4 · higher isn't always better — check the caveats below.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare

Sort

GLM-5.1Muse Spark

4.57
ACritPt
11.33
58.68
AFrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
68.42
20.83
AFrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
24.33
86.53
BGPQA diamond
86.4
93.33
AOTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
88.89
22.22
AProofBench
17
37.29
ASimpleQA Verified
66.3

Capabilities

Math

Math: Muse Spark leads 2–1 across 3 shared math benchmarks (largest gap: FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private, 68.42 vs 58.68 — single evaluator).

6 reproduced

Reasoning

Reasoning: Evenly split 1–1 across 2 shared reasoning benchmarks (largest gap: SimpleQA Verified, 66.3 vs 37.29 — single evaluator).

4 reproduced

A higher score does not always mean a better model. Each number is task performance under a disclosed harness. Of the 14 measurements across 7 shared benchmarks, 14 single-evaluator or undisclosed-protocol reports; 71% are independently reproduced. GLM-5.1 pricing is cross-check disputed — weigh cost claims with the same caution as benchmark wins. Check any benchmark's integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Frequently asked questions

Muse Spark leads 4–3 across 7 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.1 leads 3 benchmarks and Muse Spark leads 4. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

GLM-5.1 and Muse Spark have 7 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

Muse Spark leads math 2–1.

Follow the record

These models

Same tier

GLM-5.1 vs …