tensor.news
Integrity IndexModelsCompareLabsPapersMethodologyAbout
tensor.news

© 2026

Evidence

  • Integrity Index
  • Model Claim Ledger
  • Compare

Entities

  • Models
  • Benchmarks
  • Labs
  • Papers

Method

  • Methodology
  • About
  • Privacy

Machine

  • Feed (Atom)
  • llms.txt
  • llms-full.txt
  • Sitemap

tensor.news grades benchmarks and tags model claims by evidence status. Every fact carries a source record and provenance. Scores are framed as task performance under a disclosed harness, never as deployed capability.

← Compare

GLM-5.1 vs Muse Spark

Verdict

Muse Spark leads 5–1 across 6 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 1 · Muse Spark 5 · higher isn't always better — see caveats.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

GLM-5.1Muse Spark
  • 4.57
    CritPt
    11.33
  • 58.68
    FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private
    68.42
  • 20.83
    FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private
    24.33
  • 80.64
    GPQA diamond
    86.4
  • 92.21
    OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
    88.89
  • 37.29
    SimpleQA Verified
    66.3
A higher number is not always a better model. Each score is task performance under a disclosed harness, and some of these benchmarks are saturated or scored under mixed harnesses. Follow any benchmark to its integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Follow the record

These models

  • GLM-5.192.21
  • Muse Spark88.89