GPT-4o mini vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

Verdict

GPT-4o mini leads 2–0 across 2 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4o mini 2 · Qwen2.5-Coder-32B 0 · higher isn't always better — check the caveats below.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare

Sort

GPT-4o miniQwen2.5-Coder-32B

91.3
CGSM8K
91.1
75.73
CMMLU
72.13

A higher score does not always mean a better model. Each number is task performance under a disclosed harness. Of the 4 measurements across 2 shared benchmarks, 4 single-evaluator or undisclosed-protocol reports; 0% are independently reproduced. Check any benchmark's integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-4o mini leads 2–0 across 2 shared benchmarks. GPT-4o mini leads 2 benchmarks and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 0. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

GPT-4o mini and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B have 2 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

GPT-4o mini vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Frequently asked questions

Follow the record

These models

Same tier

GPT-4o mini vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Frequently asked questions

Follow the record

These models

Same tier