Benchmark explainer
What is Aider polyglot?
unknown
Aider polyglot as reported in Epoch AI's Capabilities Index CSV.
How it's scored
- Metric
- normalized performance in Epoch CSV, rendered as accuracy (%)
- Score ceiling
- 100
- Construction
- unknown
- Human baseline
- unknown
How trustworthy
Discrimination
100/100Does it still separate models?
Saturation headroom
98/100How far from ceiling / clustered at the top?
Contamination resistance
17.8/100Public vs held-out; training-leak risk.
Harness comparability
100/100Is it apples-to-apples, or mixed / vendor-optimized?
Freshness
83.5/100How old is the benchmark?
Contamination history: unknown
Limitations: unknown
Who leads Aider polyglot
| Model | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 | 88 | unverified |
| o3-pro | 84.9 | unverified |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025) | 83.1 | unverified |
| o3 | 81.3 | unverified |
| Grok 4 | 79.6 | unverified |
Compare the top Aider polyglot scorers
Frequently asked questions
Aider polyglot: Aider polyglot as reported in Epoch AI's Capabilities Index CSV.
GPT-5 leads Aider polyglot at 88. The full leaderboard above lists every recorded measurement, not just the headline number.
45 models have recorded scores on Aider polyglot, spanning a score spread of 84.4.
tensor.news grades Aider polyglot A for integrity (score 85/100), ranking #32 of 65 benchmarks we assess across discrimination, saturation, contamination resistance, harness comparability, and freshness.
No — Aider polyglot still has headroom and continues to discriminate between models rather than bunching them at the ceiling.
Its test set is unknown, so contamination risk is on the table: a high score may partly reflect training-data overlap rather than capability.
Scores are reported under a consistent harness, so comparisons on Aider polyglot are reasonably apples-to-apples.
Every Aider polyglot measurement is source-backed and tagged reproduced, self-reported, or unverified; the underlying record cites epoch.ai/data/eci_benchmarks.csv.