Verdict
Claude Fable 5.1 leads 16–0 across 16 shared benchmarks.
Claude Fable 5.1 16 · Gemini 3.7 Flash 0 · higher isn't always better — check the caveats below.
Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare
Unknown: Claude Fable 5.1 leads 5–0 across 5 shared unknown benchmarks (largest gap: Furniture Assembly, 57.14 vs 0 — protocols undisclosed).
Agentic: Claude Fable 5.1 leads 2–0 across 2 shared agentic benchmarks (largest gap: Remote Labor Index, 17.92 vs 5 — protocols undisclosed).
Coding: Claude Fable 5.1 leads 2–0 across 2 shared coding benchmarks (largest gap: FrontierSWE, 56.29 vs 20.26 — single evaluator).
Math: Claude Fable 5.1 leads 2–0 across 2 shared math benchmarks (largest gap: FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private, 87.8 vs 36.59 — protocols undisclosed).
Reasoning: Claude Fable 5.1 leads 2–0 across 2 shared reasoning benchmarks (largest gap: ARC-AGI, 97.5 vs 95.5 — single evaluator).
Claude Fable 5.1 leads 16–0 across 16 shared benchmarks. Claude Fable 5.1 leads 16 benchmarks and Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 0. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.
Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.7 Flash have 16 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.
Claude Fable 5.1 leads unknown 5–0. Claude Fable 5.1 leads agentic 2–0.