Skip to content

GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Verdict

GPT-5.5 Pro leads 9–0 across 9 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.2 0 · GPT-5.5 Pro 9 · higher isn't always better — see caveats.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare

Sort
GLM-5.2GPT-5.5 Pro

Capabilities

Reasoning

Reasoning: GPT-5.5 Pro leads 3–0 across 3 shared reasoning benchmarks (largest gap: SimpleQA Verified, 64.5 vs 38.1 — single evaluator).

4 reproduced2 unverified

Math

Math: GPT-5.5 Pro leads 2–0 across 2 shared math benchmarks (largest gap: FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private, 78.05 vs 29.27 — single evaluator).

4 reproduced

What the labs claim

Vendor claims — compare against the measured scores above. A claim is what a developer says about its own model, not an independent measurement.

GLM-5.2

Coding

  • Advanced Coding with Flexible Effort: Stronger coding capabilities with multiple thinking effort levels to balance performance and latency

Context Handling

  • We propose IndexShare, which reuses the same indexer across every four sparse attention layers, reducing per-token FLOPs by 2.9x at a 1M context length.

General

  • Pure Open: An MIT open-source license - no regional limits, technical access without borders

GPT-5.5 Pro

General

  • In GPT-5.5 Pro, early testers are seeing a significant step up in both the difficulty and quality of work ChatGPT can take on

Reasoning

  • GPT-5.5 Pro, designed for even harder questions and higher-accuracy work, is available to Pro, Business, and Enterprise users.

Writing

  • testers found GPT-5.5 Pro's responses significantly more comprehensive, well-structured, accurate, relevant, and useful
A higher number is not always a better model. Each score is task performance under a disclosed harness. Of the 18 measurements across 9 shared benchmarks, 18 single-evaluator or undisclosed-protocol reports; 67% are independently reproduced. GLM-5.2 pricing is cross-check disputed — weigh cost claims with the same caution as benchmark wins. Follow any benchmark to its integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Follow the record