Llama 3.1-405B vs Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
Verdict
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) leads 3–0 across 3 shared benchmarks.
Llama 3.1-405B 0 · Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 3 · higher isn't always better — see caveats.
Per-benchmark head-to-head
Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare
Sort
Llama 3.1-405BQwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
Capabilities
Reasoning
Reasoning: Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) leads 2–0 across 2 shared reasoning benchmarks (largest gap: GPQA diamond, 85.44 vs 34.55 — single evaluator).
2 reproduced2 unverified
What the labs claim
Vendor claims — compare against the measured scores above. A claim is what a developer says about its own model, not an independent measurement.
Llama 3.1-405B
Context Handling
“These are multilingual and have a significantly longer context length of 128K, state-of-the-art tool use, and overall stronger reasoning capabilities.”
ai.meta.com2024
General
“Llama 3.1 405B is in a class of its own, with unmatched flexibility, control, and state-of-the-art capabilities that rival the best closed source models.”
ai.meta.com2024“Llama 3.1 405B is the first openly available model that rivals the top AI models when it comes to state-of-the-art capabilities in general knowledge, steerability, math, tool use”
ai.meta.com2024
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview)
Agentic / Tool Use
Coding
“It achieves the top score on six major coding benchmarks - SWE-bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0, SkillsBench, QwenClawBench, QwenWebBench, and SciCode - with substantial gains over its predecessor”
qwen.ai2026