tensor.news
Integrity IndexModelsCompareLabsPapersMethodologyAbout
tensor.news

© 2026

Evidence

  • Integrity Index
  • Model Claim Ledger
  • Compare

Entities

  • Models
  • Benchmarks
  • Labs
  • Papers

Method

  • Methodology
  • About
  • Privacy

Machine

  • Feed (Atom)
  • llms.txt
  • llms-full.txt
  • Sitemap

tensor.news grades benchmarks and tags model claims by evidence status. Every fact carries a source record and provenance. Scores are framed as task performance under a disclosed harness, never as deployed capability.

← Models

Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic·released 2025-11-24

independently reproduced

Scored on 24 benchmarks. 29% of its scores are independently reproduced — the rest are self-reported or unverified.

24
Benchmarks scored
0
SOTA leads
86.1
Best score
29%
Reproduced
7 of 24

Benchmark fingerprint

Every score, ranked, colored by evidence status.

  • OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
    86.1
  • Cybench
    82
  • GPQA diamond
    81.4
  • ARC-AGI
    80
  • SWE-Bench verified
    76.65
  • GeoBench
    75
  • OSWorld
    66.3
  • WeirdML
    63.7
  • Terminal Bench
    63.1
  • SimpleBench
    54.4
  • GDPval
    45.5
  • Balrog
    43.5
  • SimpleQA Verified
    41.8
  • ARC-AGI-2
    37.64
  • FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
    34.39
  • GSO-Bench
    26.5
  • HLE
    21.43
  • CL-bench
    21.1
  • APEX-Agents
    18.4
  • PostTrainBench
    17.29
  • Chess Puzzles
    12
  • VPCT
    10
  • FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
    4.88
  • Remote Labor Index
    3.75

All benchmark scores

BenchmarkScoreEvidence statusMeasured
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.1accuracy (%)reproduced· optimized2025-11-24
Cybench82accuracy (%)self-reported· optimized2025-11-24
GPQA diamond81.4accuracy (%)reproduced· optimized2025-11-24
ARC-AGI80accuracy (%)unverified· optimized2025-11-24
SWE-Bench verified76.65accuracy (%)reproduced· optimized2025-11-24
GeoBench75accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
OSWorld66.3accuracy (%)unverified· optimized2025-11-24
WeirdML63.7accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
Terminal Bench63.1accuracy (%)unverified· optimized2025-11-24
SimpleBench54.4accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
GDPval45.5accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
Balrog43.5accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
SimpleQA Verified41.8accuracy (%)reproduced2025-11-24
ARC-AGI-237.64accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private34.39accuracy (%)reproduced2025-11-24
GSO-Bench26.5accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
HLE21.43accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
CL-bench21.1accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
APEX-Agents18.4accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
PostTrainBench17.29accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
Chess Puzzles12accuracy (%)reproduced2025-11-24
VPCT10accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private4.88accuracy (%)reproduced2025-11-24
Remote Labor Index3.75accuracy (%)unverified2025-11-24
24 source records · epoch_benchmarks. Every score is evidence-linked.

Follow the record

More from Anthropic

  • Claude Fable 599.72
  • Claude Opus 4.898.33
  • Claude Opus 4.797.8
  • Claude Sonnet 4.597.73
  • Claude Haiku 4.596.36
  • Claude Opus 4.694.44