tensor.news
Integrity IndexModelsCompareLabsPapersMethodologyAbout
tensor.news

© 2026

Evidence

  • Integrity Index
  • Model Claim Ledger
  • Compare

Entities

  • Models
  • Benchmarks
  • Labs
  • Papers

Method

  • Methodology
  • About
  • Privacy

Machine

  • Feed (Atom)
  • llms.txt
  • llms-full.txt
  • Sitemap

tensor.news grades benchmarks and tags model claims by evidence status. Every fact carries a source record and provenance. Scores are framed as task performance under a disclosed harness, never as deployed capability.

← Compare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.4 Pro

Verdict

GPT-5.4 Pro leads 6–5 across 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro 5 · GPT-5.4 Pro 6 · higher isn't always better — see caveats.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Gemini 3.1 ProGPT-5.4 Pro
  • 98
    ARC-AGI
    94.5
  • 77.1
    ARC-AGI-2
    83.33
  • 55
    Chess Puzzles
    58.6
  • 17.71
    CritPt
    30
  • 26.83
    FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
    58.54
  • 59.65
    FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
    82.46
  • 92.13
    GPQA diamond
    92.8
  • 43.74
    HLE
    41.51
  • 75.52
    SimpleBench
    68.92
  • 77.3
    SimpleQA Verified
    47.8
  • 72.1
    WeirdML
    57.44
A higher number is not always a better model. Each score is task performance under a disclosed harness, and some of these benchmarks are saturated or scored under mixed harnesses. Follow any benchmark to its integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Follow the record

These models

  • Gemini 3.1 Pro98
  • GPT-5.4 Pro94.5

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs …

  • vs PowerMoE-3b
  • vs Claude Fable 5
  • vs GPT-5.5
  • vs Llama 3.1-405B
  • vs phi-3-small 7.4B