GLM-5.1 vs Kimi K3

Verdict

Kimi K3 leads 7–0 across 7 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 0 · Kimi K3 7 · higher isn't always better — check the caveats below.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare

Sort

GLM-5.1Kimi K3

14.77
AChess Puzzles
35.82
4.57
ACritPt
23.4
86.53
BGPQA diamond
90.82
93.33
AOTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
97.22
22.22
AProofBench
87
37.29
ASimpleQA Verified
42.7
57.1
AWeirdML
82.57

Capabilities

Reasoning

Reasoning: Kimi K3 leads 2–0 across 2 shared reasoning benchmarks (largest gap: SimpleQA Verified, 42.7 vs 37.29 — single evaluator).

4 reproduced

A higher score does not always mean a better model. Each number is task performance under a disclosed harness. Of the 14 measurements across 7 shared benchmarks, 14 single-evaluator or undisclosed-protocol reports; 57% are independently reproduced. GLM-5.1 pricing is cross-check disputed — weigh cost claims with the same caution as benchmark wins. Check any benchmark's integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Frequently asked questions

Kimi K3 leads 7–0 across 7 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.1 leads 0 benchmarks and Kimi K3 leads 7. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

GLM-5.1 and Kimi K3 have 7 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

Kimi K3 leads reasoning 2–0.

Follow the record

These models

Same tier

GLM-5.1 vs …

Kimi K3 vs …

Frequently asked questions

Kimi K3 leads 7–0 across 7 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.1 leads 0 benchmarks and Kimi K3 leads 7. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

GLM-5.1 and Kimi K3 have 7 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

Kimi K3 leads reasoning 2–0.