GLM-5.1 vs Grok 4.6

Verdict

Grok 4.6 leads 9–0 across 9 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 0 · Grok 4.6 9 · higher isn't always better — check the caveats below.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare

Sort

GLM-5.1Grok 4.6

40.9
AAPEX-Agents
65.3
15.82
AChess Puzzles
29.5
36.84
AFrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
65.96
86.53
BGPQA diamond
92
93.33
BOTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
99.17
22.22
BProofBench
51
46.12
ASimpleBench
71.08
34
ASimpleQA Verified
49.3
57.1
AWeirdML
67.29

Capabilities

Reasoning

Reasoning: Grok 4.6 leads 3–0 across 3 shared reasoning benchmarks (largest gap: SimpleBench, 71.08 vs 46.12 — single evaluator).

2 reproduced4 unverified

A higher score does not always mean a better model. Each number is task performance under a disclosed harness. Of the 18 measurements across 9 shared benchmarks, 18 single-evaluator or undisclosed-protocol reports; 28% are independently reproduced. GLM-5.1 pricing is cross-check disputed — weigh cost claims with the same caution as benchmark wins. Check any benchmark's integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 leads 9–0 across 9 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.1 leads 0 benchmarks and Grok 4.6 leads 9. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

GLM-5.1 and Grok 4.6 have 9 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

Grok 4.6 leads reasoning 3–0.

Follow the record

These models

Same tier

GLM-5.1 vs …

Grok 4.6 vs …

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 leads 9–0 across 9 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.1 leads 0 benchmarks and Grok 4.6 leads 9. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

GLM-5.1 and Grok 4.6 have 9 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

Grok 4.6 leads reasoning 3–0.