GLM-5.1 vs Grok 4.6

Verdict

Grok 4.6 leads 6–0 across 6 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 0 · Grok 4.6 6 · higher isn't always better — check the caveats below.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare

Sort

GLM-5.1Grok 4.6

14.77
AChess Puzzles
36.87
86.53
BGPQA diamond
92
93.33
AOTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
99.17
22.22
AProofBench
51
37.29
ASimpleQA Verified
54.4
57.1
AWeirdML
67.29

Capabilities

Reasoning

Reasoning: Grok 4.6 leads 2–0 across 2 shared reasoning benchmarks (largest gap: SimpleQA Verified, 54.4 vs 37.29 — single evaluator).

4 reproduced

A higher score does not always mean a better model. Each number is task performance under a disclosed harness. Of the 12 measurements across 6 shared benchmarks, 12 single-evaluator or undisclosed-protocol reports; 67% are independently reproduced. GLM-5.1 pricing is cross-check disputed — weigh cost claims with the same caution as benchmark wins. Check any benchmark's integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 leads 6–0 across 6 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.1 leads 0 benchmarks and Grok 4.6 leads 6. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

GLM-5.1 and Grok 4.6 have 6 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

Grok 4.6 leads reasoning 2–0.

Follow the record

These models

Same tier

GLM-5.1 vs …

Grok 4.6 vs …

Frequently asked questions

Grok 4.6 leads 6–0 across 6 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.1 leads 0 benchmarks and Grok 4.6 leads 6. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

GLM-5.1 and Grok 4.6 have 6 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

Grok 4.6 leads reasoning 2–0.