GLM-5.1 vs Inkling

Verdict

GLM-5.1 leads 7–2 across 9 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 7 · Inkling 2 · higher isn't always better — check the caveats below.

Per-benchmark head-to-head

Reported scores — protocols may differ. How we compare

Sort

GLM-5.1Inkling

40.9
AAPEX-Agents
33.8
15.82
AChess Puzzles
16.88
36.84
AFrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
33.33
86.53
BGPQA diamond
84.34
93.33
BOTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
88.88
22.22
BProofBench
0
46.12
ASimpleBench
40
34
ASimpleQA Verified
40.3
57.1
AWeirdML
32.29

Capabilities

Reasoning

Reasoning: GLM-5.1 leads 2–1 across 3 shared reasoning benchmarks (largest gap: SimpleQA Verified, 40.3 vs 34 — protocols undisclosed).

2 reproduced4 unverified

A higher score does not always mean a better model. Each number is task performance under a disclosed harness. Of the 18 measurements across 9 shared benchmarks, 18 single-evaluator or undisclosed-protocol reports; 33% are independently reproduced. GLM-5.1 pricing is cross-check disputed — weigh cost claims with the same caution as benchmark wins. Check any benchmark's integrity grade before reading a win as decisive.

Frequently asked questions

GLM-5.1 leads 7–2 across 9 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.1 leads 7 benchmarks and Inkling leads 2. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

GLM-5.1 and Inkling have 9 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

GLM-5.1 leads reasoning 2–1.

Follow the record

These models

Same tier

GLM-5.1 vs …

Inkling vs …

Frequently asked questions

GLM-5.1 leads 7–2 across 9 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.1 leads 7 benchmarks and Inkling leads 2. Higher isn't always better — see the integrity caveats on each benchmark.

GLM-5.1 and Inkling have 9 benchmarks in common in our data — those are the only rows where a direct, apples-to-apples comparison is drawn.

GLM-5.1 leads reasoning 2–1.